Engineers leaving not a worrying issue: PM

Instead, the PM said, it’s a sign of private sector development 

HR: Although it was a concern, Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay clarified that engineers leaving the civil service to join the private sector is an indication of private sector development and not a worrying issue.

At the 19th meet the press session, lyonchoen said that following media reports on increasing number of civil engineers leaving the works and human settlement ministry, Royal Civil Service Commission (RCSC) was consulted. RCSC reported to the government that of the total 898 engineers in the civil service, 28 resigned last year.

“While it is a bit worrying, it is almost a good sign of private sector development,” he said. “The worry is that the ministry has to shoulder infrastructure works worth billion of ngultrums.”

For instance the East-West highway up gradation works, he said, is worth Nu 8B. Construction and improvement of national highways and bridges work have allocation of about Nu 33B in the 11th Plan.

For gewog centre road black topping alone, another Nu 6700M has been allocated. Also Nu 4.60B worth works will be carried out for construction of schools and Nu 2.30B for constructing hospitals.

When there is a lot of construction works in the country, it is necessary to have enough skilled engineers, lyonchoen said.

While there are lot of people wanting to join civil service and every year about 200 engineers graduate from the two engineering colleges of College of Science and Technology and Jigme Namgyel Polytechnic, engineer leaving civil service is nothing to be worried about. 

“When skilled engineers are leaving civil service and opting to join private sector, it is a sign of boom in private sector,” he said. “ It’s a sign of economic development.”

For now the government will face shortage of engineers, but it’s not an unresolvable issue, he said.  “If the country’s economy doesn’t develop, everyone will hold onto government jobs.”

Moreover, a lot of works related to electric engineering are opening, he said. “It is an indication that private sector is growing and opportunities are plenty in private sector.”

Bhutan at the moment has a total of 3,894 contractors. Of which 148 are class A contractors. In 2014, construction sector alone contributed Nu 18.50B to the Gross Domestic Product. It amounted to 15.5 percent of the total GDP contribution last year.

The issue on engineers was raised during the works and human settlement ministry’s mid-term review on September 10. Particularly in the Department of Roads (DoR), director Karma Galay had reported that qualified and experienced engineers are leaving the department to join the private sector.

“They cite reasons such as lack of career path, especially to become executives, greener pastures and lack of training and other opportunists,” the director had said.

In the last two years between July 2013 and August 2015, a total of 134 engineers resigned from the ministry. The highest number of engineers at 57 resigned from the department of engineering services, followed by DoR, which lost 53 of its skilled people.

Another 24 left civil service from four thromdes, construction development board and the Secretariat.

Chief Human Resource officer of ministry, Pem Tshewang said that on retrospection, most of the voluntary resignations of mid to senior level engineers were leaving for greener pastures where remuneration and other monetary benefits was far better than in the civil service.

One of the recommendations presented during the mid-term review, as a measure to retain skilled engineers was that the government instruct the RCSC to allow civil servants with engineering background to become executives.

Other recommendations include providing better training and other exposure opportunities to engineers, allowing diploma engineering to take up the position of chief engineers and scarcity allowance.

Nirmala Pokhrel

4 replies
  1. Ugyen_Norbu
    Ugyen_Norbu says:

    Certainly, we can view the situation as emphasized by our PM; maybe the private sector is improving, but that does not do the justice to the issue raised; answers of the kind only help dodge the media for the day. However, it can be equally viewed as government under-performing the barely surviving private sectors. What justification do we have for favoring the former view as opposed to the latter?

    Therefore, with all due respect, we would like our government to initiate a true remedy for the wound rather than patching the symptoms. More incentives, better capacity building opportunity distribution, objective evaluation of output etc. may prove to anchor our skilled employees and nurture the rest.

  2. thoughtboy
    thoughtboy says:

    Ok Let us admit the private sector has developed and its a good sign for our country but let me ask PM what about our government improvement in such areas. There are lots of side effects and adverse effect in the government’s technical functioning.
    1: The lack of technical personals means government’s construction will be of less quality without adequate personals to monitor the project.
    2: The lack of adequate technical personals means extra burden on those left in govt sector which in turn will again trigger their resignation ultimately.
    3: Bad roads, schools , govt institutions, etc will be affected
    So i think PM should not be saying such things in public and try to encourage the engineers in govt sector to work on their own parent organization other wise the statement seems like ” its ok you people in private sector build good things for country as for govt, we will continue building roads which dun last one monsoon, build retaining walls which is washed away every season etc, etc because we don’t have engineers”

  3. Jangchubsempalugiraw
    Jangchubsempalugiraw says:

    Nothing about remuneration or pay packages of skilled engineers. We know Doctors also demanded and they got some allowances. Teachers demanded they got allowances. First 5yr 5% then 5-10 yrs 10% allowances for teachers.

    To retain skilled engineers, one option is to give special allowance may be they deserve. Making Engineers to be executive/ manager of organization means we will be still losing skilled engineers.

  4. online
    online says:

    What a recommendation? Here the issue is loss o professional skilled personnel and the recommendation to retain them is to deploy them as executives …. What a irony ? If we r losing such engineers then it is a great relieve. No need to worry as expressed by pm. Better off with technical persons with such mentality.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply