Give NFE instructors what they deserve

Bhutan today is going through a catharsis of sorts. The whole of our education system is undergoing a significant revolution. Perhaps time has now arrived for us to think about education in the broader sense of the term. That means including not just campuses and classrooms, teachers and textbooks, and curriculum. There is today a need to look at relevance. Are we teaching our children the right skills and preparing them to face the challenges out of classrooms?  More importantly, are we including each and every Bhutanese in the education system?

Non-formal education (NFE) has had a big success in Bhutan. According to some reports, the programme empowered close to 200,000 citizens in the country with basic and numeracy courses. That is almost half the population of this country. About 80 percent of total NFE learners have acquired life skills education. Many of them have undergone vocational skills training and are doing well. Because the real idea behind the programme is to create a system of lifelong learning opportunities for all to build a skilled and knowledge-based society, Bhutan’s NFE programme and efforts were also have been recognised with UNESCO Literacy Awards. While we have done almost enough with learning centres, we have done not quite all right with NFE instructors.

Reports claim that about 90 percent of the NFE instructors have been trained on teaching methodology, adult dealings, and life skills education programmes. But that is all we have given to recognise their priceless contribution to the nation. NFE instructors are today among the lowest-paid in the country. They fall nowhere in the country’s employment category.  This has made recruitment of NFE instructors expensive. When question was raised about it in the Parliament recently, education minister said that if the concerns were genuine, the solution was to make the instructors part of civil service. We are told that education ministry has proposed to the Royal Civil Service Commission (RCSC) to include NFE and early childhood care and development instructors part of the civil servants and to place them at grade S5A. This is a good development. Enhancing adult literacy rate to near 100 percent by 2020, providing learning opportunity to illiterate, neo-literate and dropouts, providing lifelong learning opportunity through continuing education programme will remain a challenge otherwise.

Strategic Plan for NFE Programme (2016 – 2018) says that finding adequate number of academic personnel with higher qualifications is a challenge facing the programme. This could be true because NFE instructors need more than just Nu 8,300 monthly salary. They need to know their employment status and where they belong. It is upon RCSC and education ministry to follow up and decide whether NFE instructors could be counted among the civil servants. Because we are talking about education, it matters all the more.

A nation that thinks about education of its citizens and makes sure that it goes beyond school and college systems to involve all who missed the bus or dropped out along the way is a forward-looking nation.

1 reply
  1. irfan
    irfan says:

    Non Formal Education is an effective way for education delivery for those who have missed the formal school education process. But it’s expected to be equally challenging a task for the trainers to deliver the education in a meaningful package to the consumers of education at that stage of life, both physical and economical.

    I hope that it’s also possible to educate people with science, health, arts, laws and commerce and their simple applications in relations with the day to day life requirements. That’s considering the scopes with NFE. It’s possible to made education a mean to understand the environment better for these late comers with such changes in a teaching approach.

    But before that; it’s always necessary that those getting enrolled for NFE learn a lot more than just read, write and count. Moreover, it’s effective if the teaching materials can be made with relevance to one’s requirements and general living. And accordingly, different subjects can be taught in a overall package that’s both easy and fun to understand.

    So one expects the trainers to have on the spot teaching skills where one can access the learners, their requirements, level of understanding, willingness to application of education; and teach accordingly. That way; the system of teaching needs a bit of flexibility from that very training point of view. Now that’s in my personal opinion. And still, you expect the education delivery process under NFE to be a bit personal and specific. To provide education as a solution to drawbacks and gaps in leading the life we live is never easy at a later stage where NFE comes to effect.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply